TEAS Reading · Practice Question

    Evaluating Evidence Effectiveness: TEAS Practice Question with Answer & Explanation

    An original TEAS 7-style reading practice question, written for nursing-school applicants — with a full breakdown of every answer choice.

    Question

    A biographer argues that Mary Lou Williams was a foundational architect of modern jazz, citing her complex arrangements for Duke Ellington, her mentorship of bebop legends like Thelonious Monk, and her innovative use of rhythmic dissonance in the 1940s. How effective is this evidence in supporting the claim that she was a pioneer of the genre?

    • A.The evidence is insufficient; it relies on personal anecdotes rather than objective historical milestones.
    • B.The evidence is biased; it focuses exclusively on her visual style while ignoring her actual musical recordings.
    • C.The evidence is compelling; it connects her specific technical innovations to the evolution of the genre.
      Correct
    • D.The evidence is contradictory; it claims she was a pioneer but later states she followed existing musical trends.

    Correct answer: C. The evidence is effective because it provides specific, technical, and professional examples that directly support the claim of being a pioneer.

    Why Choice C is Correct

    In the TEAS Reading section, evaluating the effectiveness of evidence requires you to determine if the facts provided directly support the author's primary claim. In this scenario, the claim is that Mary Lou Williams was a "foundational architect of modern jazz."

    The evidence provided includes:

    • Professional Accomplishments: Writing arrangements for major figures like Duke Ellington.
    • Influence on Future Leaders: Mentoring bebop pioneers.
    • Technical Innovation: Using rhythmic dissonance.

    Choice C is correct because the evidence is compelling and relevant. It doesn't just say she was "great"; it identifies specific technical contributions (dissonance) and structural influences (arrangements and mentorship) that map directly to the definition of a "pioneer" or "architect."

    Analysis of Incorrect Options

    • Choice A: The evidence is not "insufficiently based on anecdotes." Mentorship and musical arrangements are documented professional milestones, not just casual stories or rumors.
    • Choice B: The text does not mention her "visual style" at all. It focuses entirely on her musical output and professional relationships, making this an inaccurate critique.
    • Choice D: There is no contradiction in the prompt. The prompt consistently describes her as a leader and innovator, never suggesting she was a mere follower of trends.

    TEAS Concept: Evaluating Evidence

    When you encounter questions about the "effectiveness of a claim" on the TEAS, you are being tested on Critical Thinking. You must look for sufficiency (is there enough?) and relevance (does it actually prove the point?).

    Effective evidence usually contains:

    1. Quantitative Data: Dates, numbers, or specific statistics.
    2. Expert Testimony or Influence: Proof of how the subject influenced their field.
    3. Specific Examples: Concrete instances of the claim in action (e.g., "rhythmic dissonance").

    Nursing School Connection

    As a nurse, you will be required to practice Evidence-Based Practice (EBP). Just as you must evaluate if a biography provides enough evidence to support a claim of "pioneer," you will have to evaluate clinical research to see if a specific treatment is "effective" for your patients. Understanding what constitutes strong, relevant evidence is a foundational skill for both the TEAS and Western medicine.

    Quick study tip: To determine if a claim is effective, ask yourself: 'If I take these facts away, does the author’s argument fall apart?' If yes, the evidence is likely strong.

    Ready to practice more TEAS Reading questions?

    Test yourself on the full TEAS reading question bank — with instant scoring, explanations, and progress tracking.

    Take a free TEAS Reading quiz See all Reading questions

    More TEAS Reading practice questions

    Reading
    Distinguishing Fact and Opinion
    Distinguish between objective facts and subjective opinions by identifying value-based adjectives like 'elegant' versus measurable data.
    Reading
    Summarizing Multi-Step Narratives
    The correct summary accurately reflects the character's environment, her emotional response to the stimuli, and her final action of fleeing.
    Reading
    Reading Comprehension Inference
    Learn how to identify logical inferences in TEAS reading passages by comparing sourdough maintenance to commercial yeast.
    Reading
    Vocabulary in Context
    Unlock the meaning of 'incendiary' using context clues. Learn the substitution method to identify synonyms on the TEAS Reading section.
    Reading
    Determining the Main Idea
    The primary message summarizes the passage's main point: that textile waste is a major problem requiring a shift in how we produce and recycle fabric.
    Reading
    Interpreting Graphic Data
    To interpret a bar graph, you must identify the scale and units on the vertical axis to understand the numerical value represented by the bars.

    Learn more about TEAS Reading

    Review the wider topic with these closely related study guides and practice resources.

    TEAS Reading Practice Guide

    Review passage strategy, evidence, inference, and author purpose.

    TEAS 7 Reading Study Guide

    Build passage strategy for the most-tested reading skills.

    TEAS Reading Practice Questions

    Work through additional reading examples with answers.

    What Reading Questions Are on TEAS 7?

    Understand the reading section's question types and skills.